Most ATS systems were built for HR departments running corporate hiring cycles. OS × Tracking was built inside a working staffing operation: pipeline, review, file management, and team communication unified into a single operational environment. No enterprise overhead. No template workflows. Configured per team.
The teams we work with need an ATS that handles real candidate movement, real file review, and real internal communication, without paying enterprise license fees for features they’ll never use. OS × Tracking started as the system Sequoyah Staffing’s team runs daily. We refined it until it could ship for any small-to-mid hiring operation that’s outgrown spreadsheets but isn’t ready for the price tag and rigidity of enterprise platforms.
Each bucket represents a specific operational outcome the system delivers, not a feature dump.
OS × Tracking is sold as a custom engagement, not a per-seat subscription. Most ATS platforms scale cost by recruiter count, which punishes growing teams for the wrong reason. We scope each engagement around team size, candidate volume, and which capabilities matter most to your operation. No hidden user fees. No "premium tier" gates. The feature set you see is the feature set you get.Pricing is set during a short diagnostic call. We want to understand the operation before we quote it.
“Great job, we have a brand new website thanks to this start up business. Well done.”
A side-by-side, not adversarial. Hiring teams choose the system that fits their operation; here’s how the three options differ.
The shift: hiring software that adapts to your operation instead of forcing your operation to adapt.
Pricing: $100–$300+ per recruiter per month, plus implementation fees.
"Free" until you count the candidates that never made it through.
Live with
OS × Tracking runs daily inside Sequoyah Staffing, the staffing operation we partnered with to build it. The team uses it as their primary hiring system. Additional limited-access slots are rolling out through 2026, prioritized for operators whose workflow fits the system’s architecture.
OS × Tracking is fully operational on its own. As the rest of the OS × ecosystem ships, integration points open: candidate-to-client hand-offs through OS × Workspace, communication aggregation through OS × Inbox, automated approval chains through OS × Flow. None of this requires the rest of the stack to be useful today.
Integrates with
A short conversation tells us whether the fit makes sense. If it does, we’ll talk pricing, configuration, and onboarding. If it doesn’t, we’ll say so, and point you to a system that might.
